Reviews

User reviews

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Being an enthusiast of war history specially ,obviously indo Pak war history tempted me to read,but I was really upset by the biased way,and one sided narration of the war by the writer,recorded history cant be altered.the way writer has written and narrate different incidence portraying as if indian army was not interested to capture Lahore,which is against,even it is contrary to what indian officers did wreite themselves.indian general chaudary had announced that at the evening of september 1965.a tea party will be held to celeberate victory,pakistanis both army and PAF destryed indian without mercy,your today Anna hazaray was ran away leaving there vehicles engines in start mode,indian officers themselves admits that it was PAF that first on sep 1st destroyed 4 IAF vampires,on sep 6 pathankot turned to ashes by PAF(read ,IAF officers confess it)in east Tail choppers squadron of PAF made kalaikunda obscure into fire and smoke.the book is to cater ordinary indians but not to well educated and professional soldiers of both sides Indians and Pakistanis. 

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

the real history of war has not been written by Pakistan govt till now for the certificate ,but the news of 65 war showed that Pakistan had damage Indian Army at a big level 600 tanks 75 jet plans and others too.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I do not think Pak was able to gain anything in 65 war.I think to some extent Pakistan lost this war because it was not able to achieve its main objective of capturing Kashmir from India.
Pakistanis always lost against India.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

It is fact that indians always try to change the history of war but history can not be changed and world knows what was happened.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I think the Defence minister of India is trying to convince to the international world that pakistan start the Was n go offencive. History tells a true story on this was. whis pakistan wins by a margen.

All reviews - 5
5 stars - 0
4 stars - 0
3 stars - 0
2 stars - 0
1 star - 0

All reviews - 5
Editorial reviews - 0

All reviews - 5