Fighting for Justice: The History and Origins of Adversary TrialThis book shows how adversary trial evolved in England only in the 18th century. Its origins and significance have tended to go unrecognised by judges, lawyers, jurists and researchers until relatively modern times when conflict has become a key social issue. Even now, there is a major dispute as to how and why adversary trial came into existence and little connection has been made with its contribution to the genesis of many rules of evidence and procedure and the modern-day doctrine of human rights - whereby citizens are able to take a stand against the power of the state or vested interests. John Hostettler sets the record straight. John Hostettler is an eminent commentator on criminal justice and its history. In this book he focuses not only on the birth and meaning of adversary trial but also on the historic central role of the lawyer and advocate Sir William Garrow Hostettler assesses how deep-rooted is the notion of opposing parties in the common law, the English psyche and thus within other countries such as the USA that have followed the same model - whereby lawyers champion opposing causes. One aim of the book is to provide an aid to understanding of present-day moves for reform in the direction of restorative methods by outlining the contribution that adversary trial has made to the development of common law systems. 'Interestingly characterises the emergence of adversary trial, in which defence counsel is allowed to cross-examine the prosecution, as the genesis of a recognisably modern human rights culture, which has subsequently expanded across the developed world': Thames View |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 44
Page 16
... found the prisoner ' guilty of manslaughter but not of murder ' and she was burnt in the hand and discharged.52 Nevertheless , as Garrow , more than any other lawyer , was responsible for the extensive growth of adversarial criminal ...
... found the prisoner ' guilty of manslaughter but not of murder ' and she was burnt in the hand and discharged.52 Nevertheless , as Garrow , more than any other lawyer , was responsible for the extensive growth of adversarial criminal ...
Page 24
... guilty and Fitzjames Stephen remarked that , ' the rule which prevailed then and long afterwards of finishing all ... found guilty . Priddle was sentenced to two years ' imprisonment , Holloway and Stephens received 18 months each and ...
... guilty and Fitzjames Stephen remarked that , ' the rule which prevailed then and long afterwards of finishing all ... found guilty . Priddle was sentenced to two years ' imprisonment , Holloway and Stephens received 18 months each and ...
Page 25
... not only judges but also jurors who had to sit throughout and retire without ' meat , drink , fire or candle ' until they unanimously agreed on a verdict.30 In a trial in 1588 jurors were fined when they were found ... guilty , when they ...
... not only judges but also jurors who had to sit throughout and retire without ' meat , drink , fire or candle ' until they unanimously agreed on a verdict.30 In a trial in 1588 jurors were fined when they were found ... guilty , when they ...
Page 26
... not so well be discovered from the artificial defence of others speaking for them.'36 From which he concluded that the absence of counsel helped the jury convict the guilty.37 He also thought that everyone could speak to a matter of ...
... not so well be discovered from the artificial defence of others speaking for them.'36 From which he concluded that the absence of counsel helped the jury convict the guilty.37 He also thought that everyone could speak to a matter of ...
Page 27
... guilty of what is charged upon him.'53 After hearing Lilburne's defence he went further and told the jury , ' you ... found Lilburne not guilty.55 But even in early times the ban was not always absolute . Hawkins cited a case from the ...
... guilty of what is charged upon him.'53 After hearing Lilburne's defence he went further and told the jury , ' you ... found Lilburne not guilty.55 But even in early times the ban was not always absolute . Hawkins cited a case from the ...
Contents
9 | |
21 | |
32 | |
4 Rights of the Individual | 50 |
5 Sir William Garrow | 59 |
6 Garrow at the Old Bailey 1 | 77 |
7 Garrow at the Old Bailey 2 | 96 |
8 Rules of Criminal Evidence | 116 |
10 Conclusion | 149 |
Glossary 1 Judicial and Historical Terms | 162 |
Glossary 2 Crimes Tried Frequently at the Old Bailey | 165 |
Bibliography | 167 |
Appendix | 172 |
Index | 174 |
Back cover | 177 |
9 Counsel Finally Address the Jury | 135 |
Other editions - View all
Fighting for Justice: The History and Origins of Adversary Trial John Hostettler Limited preview - 2006 |
Fighting for Justice: The History and Origins of Adversary Trial John Hostettler No preview available - 2006 |
Common terms and phrases
27 October accused acquitted address the jury Adversary Criminal Trial Adversary Procedure adversary system adversary trial advocacy Aikles alleged appeared asked assize courts assizes barristers Barry Rose Bill Brougham Cairns charged client confession convicted Counsel Act court courtroom crime Criminal Justice Criminal Law criminal procedure cross-examination Crown death December defence counsel Edinburgh Review eighteenth century England Erskine examination felony felony trials found guilty give evidence Glorious Revolution hearsay House of Commons human rights Ibid indictment innocent inquisitorial system J.H. Langbein J.M. Beattie jury found Landsman Law Review London Lord murder nineteenth century oath OBP Online offence Old Bailey Origins of Adversary Parliament points of law political presumption of innocence prisoner prosecuting counsel prosecution witnesses prosecutor question robbery rules of evidence Scales of Justice sentenced theft thief-takers Thomas told the jury Treason Trials Act Trial of John Trial of William truth Vogler Whig William Garrow www.oldbaileyonline.org