The Two Koreas and the Great PowersThis book explores Korea's place in terms of multiple levels and domains of interaction pertaining to foreign-policy behaviors and relations with the four regional/global powers (China, Russia, Japan, and the United States). The synergy of global transformations has now brought to an end Korea's proverbial identity and role as the helpless shrimp among whales, and both North Korea and South Korea have taken on new roles in the process of redefining and projecting their national identities. Synthetic national identity theory offers a useful perspective on change and continuity in Korea's turbulent relationships with the great powers over the years. Following a review of Korean diplomatic history and competing theoretical approaches, along with a synthetic national-identity theory as an alternative approach, one chapter each is devoted to how Korea relates to the four powers in turn, and the book concludes with a consideration of inter-Korean relations and potential reunification. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 53
Page 17
... behaviors of similarly situated states are similarly deter- mined and thus predictable . It is only " to the extent that dynamics of a system limit the freedom of its units [ that ] their behavior and the outcomes of their behavior ...
... behaviors of similarly situated states are similarly deter- mined and thus predictable . It is only " to the extent that dynamics of a system limit the freedom of its units [ that ] their behavior and the outcomes of their behavior ...
Page 27
... behavior toward the Big Four and across time . In other words , the ultimate concern the dependent variable - in this study is the foreign policy behavior of the two Korean states . As Alastair Johnston points out , " there is no sense ...
... behavior toward the Big Four and across time . In other words , the ultimate concern the dependent variable - in this study is the foreign policy behavior of the two Korean states . As Alastair Johnston points out , " there is no sense ...
Page 65
... behavior in the two U.S. - DPRK nuclear standoffs , what explains the differences between Chinese attitudes and behavior in 2003–05 , when Beijing was devoted to preventive diplomacy , and a decade earlier , when it preferred to take a ...
... behavior in the two U.S. - DPRK nuclear standoffs , what explains the differences between Chinese attitudes and behavior in 2003–05 , when Beijing was devoted to preventive diplomacy , and a decade earlier , when it preferred to take a ...
Contents
China and the Two Koreas | 42 |
The Making of a Triangular Relationship | 52 |
New Challenges of the BeijingSeoulPyongyang | 63 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abduction Agreed Framework agreement alliance behavior Beijing Beijing's Big Four bilateral Bush administration China Chinese Cold Cold War collapse conflict cooperation countries crisis defense Despite diplomacy Diplomatic White Paper domestic DPRK DPRK's East Asia Eberstadt economic relations exports forces foreign policy future global important inter-Korean interaction international relations Japan Japanese Kim Dae Jung Kim Il Sung Kim Jong Kim Jong Il Korean peninsula Korean reunification Korean War leaders ment military million Minister missile Moscow national identity negotiations normalization talks North and South North Korea North Korean nuclear Northeast Asian nuclear standoff nuclear weapons official peace percent political post-Cold Putin Pyongyang refugees regime regional Roh Moo-hyun role Russia S. S. Kim scenario Seoul Sino-ROK six-party talks Soviet Union strategic summit theory threat tion Tokyo trade treaty two-Korea U.S. policy unification United Nations University Press Washington Wishnick York