The Two Koreas and the Great PowersThis book explores Korea's place in terms of multiple levels and domains of interaction pertaining to foreign-policy behaviors and relations with the four regional/global powers (China, Russia, Japan, and the United States). The synergy of global transformations has now brought to an end Korea's proverbial identity and role as the helpless shrimp among whales, and both North Korea and South Korea have taken on new roles in the process of redefining and projecting their national identities. Synthetic national identity theory offers a useful perspective on change and continuity in Korea's turbulent relationships with the great powers over the years. Following a review of Korean diplomatic history and competing theoretical approaches, along with a synthetic national-identity theory as an alternative approach, one chapter each is devoted to how Korea relates to the four powers in turn, and the book concludes with a consideration of inter-Korean relations and potential reunification. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 54
Page 57
... June 1982 ; ( 3 ) Kim Jong Il's secret visit to China in June 1983 , the one and only overseas trip he had made between 1980 ( when his official inauguration as heir apparent became known ) and 2000 ; and ( 4 ) Hu Yaobang's visit to ...
... June 1982 ; ( 3 ) Kim Jong Il's secret visit to China in June 1983 , the one and only overseas trip he had made between 1980 ( when his official inauguration as heir apparent became known ) and 2000 ; and ( 4 ) Hu Yaobang's visit to ...
Page 64
... June 1994 , resulted in the landmark U.S. - DPRK Agreed Framework of October 21 , 1994. As if to take chief credit for the breakthrough , China highly praised Carter's " fruitful mediation " as showing that " dialogue is better than ...
... June 1994 , resulted in the landmark U.S. - DPRK Agreed Framework of October 21 , 1994. As if to take chief credit for the breakthrough , China highly praised Carter's " fruitful mediation " as showing that " dialogue is better than ...
Page 251
... June 18 , 2001 , the same source warned , " The agreed framework is in the danger of collapse due to the delay in the LWR provision . " 83 Nonetheless , the terrorist attacks of September 11 , 2001 , reaffirmed the diminished U.S. ...
... June 18 , 2001 , the same source warned , " The agreed framework is in the danger of collapse due to the delay in the LWR provision . " 83 Nonetheless , the terrorist attacks of September 11 , 2001 , reaffirmed the diminished U.S. ...
Contents
China and the Two Koreas | 42 |
The Making of a Triangular Relationship | 52 |
New Challenges of the BeijingSeoulPyongyang | 63 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abduction Agreed Framework agreement alliance behavior Beijing Beijing's Big Four bilateral Bush administration China Chinese Cold Cold War collapse conflict cooperation countries crisis defense Despite diplomacy Diplomatic White Paper domestic DPRK DPRK's East Asia Eberstadt economic relations exports forces foreign policy future global important inter-Korean interaction international relations Japan Japanese Kim Dae Jung Kim Il Sung Kim Jong Kim Jong Il Korean peninsula Korean reunification Korean War leaders ment military million Minister missile Moscow national identity negotiations normalization talks North and South North Korea North Korean nuclear Northeast Asian nuclear standoff nuclear weapons official peace percent political post-Cold Putin Pyongyang refugees regime regional Roh Moo-hyun role Russia S. S. Kim scenario Seoul Sino-ROK six-party talks Soviet Union strategic summit theory threat tion Tokyo trade treaty two-Korea U.S. policy unification United Nations University Press Washington Wishnick York