It would not be contended that it > extends so far as to authorize what the constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent.... The American Journal of International Law - Page 2381919Full view - About this book
| Law - 1920 - 1086 pages
...one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter (that is, of the State) without its consent. But with these exceptions it...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." I think you will see that that is pretty wide language. Now, this treaty-making power has... | |
| Ohio State Bar Association - Bar associations - 1919 - 250 pages
...of the territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Ry. vs. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country, Ware vs. Hylton, (3. Dall.) 199; Chirac vs. Chirac, 15 US (2 Wheat.) 259; Houenstein vs. Lynham,... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 1130 pages
...of the latter, without Ite consent. Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 U. S. 525, 541, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 995. But, with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Wure v. Hylton,3Dall. 199; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; HauenBtein v. Lynham, 100 US 483... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1890 - 778 pages
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...matter which is properly the . -subject of negotiation Avith a foreign country. Ware v. I/ylton, 3 Ball. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; ffauenstein... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1890 - 784 pages
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 US... | |
| James Bradley Thayer - Constitutional law - 1894 - 470 pages
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5tl. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. H niton, 3 Dall. 199; Chirac v. Ch,rac, 2 Wheat 259; Hanensle,n v. Lynliam, 100 US... | |
| Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1126 pages
...territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac r. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein r. Lynham, 100 US... | |
| Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1134 pages
...exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to tho questions which can be adjusted tonching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign countrv. Ware v, Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac r. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 US... | |
| United States - 1901 - 1234 pages
...consent. (Fort Leavervworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US, 525, 541.) But with these exceptions, it is riot perceived that there is any limit to the questions...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." 6. THE CONCEDED POWEK TO ACQUIRE TERRITORY BY TREATY OR -BY CONQUEST, INCLUDES THE RIGHT... | |
| Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons - Great Britain - 1902 - 562 pages
...of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent J5ut with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." Note 2 (August 8, 1901). In addition to the treaties with the countries mentioned in the... | |
| |