Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and ComputationUnderstanding causal structure is a central task of human cognition. Causal learning underpins the development of our concepts and categories, our intuitive theories, and our capacities for planning, imagination and inference. During the last few years, there has been an interdisciplinary revolution in our understanding of learning and reasoning: Researchers in philosophy, psychology, and computation have discovered new mechanisms for learning the causal structure of the world. This new work provides a rigorous, formal basis for theory theories of concepts and cognitive development, and moreover, the causal learning mechanisms it has uncovered go dramatically beyond the traditional mechanisms of both nativist theories, such as modularity theories, and empiricist ones, such as association or connectionism. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 83
Page 2
... appropriately called “Invasion of the Mind Snatchers”: The idea that theories are something you would find in somebody's head, rather than being abstract mathematical objects, is an idea fit only for Ichabod Crane.
... appropriately called “Invasion of the Mind Snatchers”: The idea that theories are something you would find in somebody's head, rather than being abstract mathematical objects, is an idea fit only for Ichabod Crane.
Page 7
The world out there is full of real threedimensional objects, but our perceptual system just gets some distorted two-dimensional retinal input. Still, the merest “sprog,” as you would say, has the computational power to turn that input ...
The world out there is full of real threedimensional objects, but our perceptual system just gets some distorted two-dimensional retinal input. Still, the merest “sprog,” as you would say, has the computational power to turn that input ...
Page 8
And, of course, sprogs can use vision to learn all sorts of new things about objects. In fact, they engage in perfectly sophisticated “maths” all the time—and if they can perform complex, implicit computations to support vision, ...
And, of course, sprogs can use vision to learn all sorts of new things about objects. In fact, they engage in perfectly sophisticated “maths” all the time—and if they can perform complex, implicit computations to support vision, ...
Page 9
Both infants and adults seem to perceive causality when objects (like billiard balls) collide and launch one another (Leslie & Keeble, 1987; Michotte, 1962; Oakes & Cohen, 1990). Infants also seem to expect causal constraints on object ...
Both infants and adults seem to perceive causality when objects (like billiard balls) collide and launch one another (Leslie & Keeble, 1987; Michotte, 1962; Oakes & Cohen, 1990). Infants also seem to expect causal constraints on object ...
Page 15
Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. Woodward, A. L., Phillips, A. T., & Spelke, E. S. (1993). Infants' expectations about the motion of animate versus inanimate objects.
Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. Woodward, A. L., Phillips, A. T., & Spelke, E. S. (1993). Infants' expectations about the motion of animate versus inanimate objects.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation Alison Gopnik,Laura Schulz Limited preview - 2007 |
Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation Alison Gopnik,Laura Schulz Limited preview - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
actions adults algorithms Bayesian inference Bayesian networks behavior beliefs birth control pills blicket detector Cambridge causal Bayes nets causal chain causal inference causal knowledge causal learning causal Markov condition causal model causal networks causal power causal reasoning causal relations causal relationships causal strength causal structure causal system chapter Cognitive Science common cause computational condition conditional independence conditional probabilities correlation counterfactuals covariation cues deterministic Development Developmental Psychology domain effect evidence example experiments explanations Figure framework Fuel Intake Glymour Gopnik graph schema graphical models Hagmayer human independent infants intervention interventionist intuitive theories Lagnado Laplace learners manipulated Markov Markov random field mechanism Meltzoff object observed outcome participants people’s Piston predictions prior probabilistic probabilistic graphical models probability distribution psychological question Reichenbach represent representation Schulz Sloman Sobel specific statistical stickball Tenenbaum thrombosis tion trials underlying understanding unobserved cause variables Waldmann Wellman Woodward