Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and ComputationUnderstanding causal structure is a central task of human cognition. Causal learning underpins the development of our concepts and categories, our intuitive theories, and our capacities for planning, imagination and inference. During the last few years, there has been an interdisciplinary revolution in our understanding of learning and reasoning: Researchers in philosophy, psychology, and computation have discovered new mechanisms for learning the causal structure of the world. This new work provides a rigorous, formal basis for theory theories of concepts and cognitive development, and moreover, the causal learning mechanisms it has uncovered go dramatically beyond the traditional mechanisms of both nativist theories, such as modularity theories, and empiricist ones, such as association or connectionism. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 10
Page 1
My advisor has gone completely crazy over this causal Bayes nets stuff and is
insisting that I go to this conference (on the pittance that supports graduate
researchers) and that I learn everything there is to know about the philosophy
and ...
My advisor has gone completely crazy over this causal Bayes nets stuff and is
insisting that I go to this conference (on the pittance that supports graduate
researchers) and that I learn everything there is to know about the philosophy
and ...
Page 2
And, there is no real learning involved in development but only triggering or
enrichment. ... I mean, I'll tell you all about causal learning in psychology if you'll
explain those directed acyclic graphs in plain English words? So, how about it?
And, there is no real learning involved in development but only triggering or
enrichment. ... I mean, I'll tell you all about causal learning in psychology if you'll
explain those directed acyclic graphs in plain English words? So, how about it?
Page 11
Thus, the stronger the prior association is, the less learning there will be on any
given trial. The model can be applied to human causal learning by substituting
causes for the conditioned stimulus and effects for the unconditioned stimulus.
Thus, the stronger the prior association is, the less learning there will be on any
given trial. The model can be applied to human causal learning by substituting
causes for the conditioned stimulus and effects for the unconditioned stimulus.
Page 12
The Power Theory of Probabilistic Contrast Patricia Cheng (1997) proposes an
account of human causal learning that resolves some of the difficulties with the
R-W account. Cheng proposes that people innately treat covariation as an index
of ...
The Power Theory of Probabilistic Contrast Patricia Cheng (1997) proposes an
account of human causal learning that resolves some of the difficulties with the
R-W account. Cheng proposes that people innately treat covariation as an index
of ...
Page 36
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation Alison Gopnik,Laura Schulz Limited preview - 2007 |
Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation Alison Gopnik,Laura Schulz Limited preview - 2007 |
Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation Alison Gopnik,Laura Schulz Limited preview - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
actions adults algorithms Bayesian inference Bayesian networks behavior beliefs birth control pills blicket detector Cambridge causal Bayes nets causal chain causal inference causal knowledge causal learning causal Markov condition causal model causal networks causal power causal reasoning causal relations causal relationships causal strength causal structure causal system chapter Cognitive Science common cause computational condition conditional independence conditional probabilities correlation counterfactuals covariation cues deterministic Development Developmental Psychology domain effect evidence example experiments explanations Figure framework Fuel Intake Glymour Gopnik graph schema graphical models Hagmayer human independent infants intervention interventionist intuitive theories Lagnado Laplace learners manipulated Markov Markov random field mechanism Meltzoff object observed outcome participants people’s Piston predictions prior probabilistic probabilistic graphical models probability distribution psychological question Reichenbach represent representation Schulz Sloman Sobel specific statistical stickball Tenenbaum thrombosis tion trials underlying understanding unobserved cause variables Waldmann Wellman Woodward