Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology"Media Violence and Aggression is a thoughtful and sophisticated work that dismantles the core assumptions of the media violence hypothesis piece by piece...This book makes several core contributions to the discussion on media violence effects above those seen in other critical works." —Christopher J. Ferguson, PsycCRITIQUES The authors of Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology, Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen, are determined to leave no stone unturned, no perspectives unexplored, no names left unnamed of those in the field with whom, on both empirical and theoretical grounds, they strenuously disagree. It is an engaging book that needed to be and is up close and personal. In so doing, they have produced what may be the most comprehensive critique and rebuttal to date of the omnipresent media-violence and aggression argument." —JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology provides a multimethod critique of the media violence/social aggression myth. It provides policy makers and students with information to understand why the violence/media aggression hypothesis does not explain or predict how most people react to what they see and hear in the media. Authors Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen take the reader through a history of media effects research, pointing out where that research has made claims that go beyond empirical evidence. Key Features
Intended Audience This is an ideal text for graduate courses such as Mass Communication Theory, Media and Society, Media Effects, and Research Methods in Media in the departments of communication, media studies, journalism, sociology, cultural studies, and political science. It is also vital reading for scholars, researcher, and policy makers interested in media effects. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 169
The first , as promised earlier in this chapter , is an examination of the peculiar notion of “ convergence . ” The second is the even more peculiar notion of what the causationists mean by “ behavioral aggression .
The first , as promised earlier in this chapter , is an examination of the peculiar notion of “ convergence . ” The second is the even more peculiar notion of what the causationists mean by “ behavioral aggression .
Page 175
If cultural relativism does have a place , then what's this notion about aggression having an objective , physiological / biological grounding ? In other words , from the psychophysiological perspective , aggression would , indeed ...
If cultural relativism does have a place , then what's this notion about aggression having an objective , physiological / biological grounding ? In other words , from the psychophysiological perspective , aggression would , indeed ...
Page 182
Historical Notions of Childhood The idea that children and youth require a special protection from the power of all manner ... at least since the notion of childhood innocence and vulnerability emerged as a 16th - century phenomenon .
Historical Notions of Childhood The idea that children and youth require a special protection from the power of all manner ... at least since the notion of childhood innocence and vulnerability emerged as a 16th - century phenomenon .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Setting the Stage 1 | 27 |
The Epistemology of Media Effects | 53 |
The Social Scientific Theory That Never Quite Fit | 73 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology Tom Grimes,James A. Anderson,Lori Bergen Limited preview - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
action active adolescents adults aggressive behavior American analysis Anderson appear argue argument audience authors become believe Bergen Broadcasting called causal causationists cause chapter child childhood claim coding cognitive Communication concern conclusion consequences consider continue course create crime critical cultural defined definition educational engage evidence example experience exposure fact fear Grimes harm Huesmann human important individual influence interest interpretation issue Journal learning least literature lives mass means measurement media effects media violence messages moral movie notion Opinion parents participants person picture play political population position present problem programs psychological psychopathology question reason relationship response result Review scientific social society suggest television theory things tion turn understand University viewers viewing watching young