Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology
SAGE Publications, 2008 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 268 pages
"Media Violence and Aggression is a thoughtful and sophisticated work that dismantles the core assumptions of the media violence hypothesis piece by piece...This book makes several core contributions to the discussion on media violence effects above those seen in other critical works."
—Christopher J. Ferguson, PsycCRITIQUES
The authors of Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology, Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen, are determined to leave no stone unturned, no perspectives unexplored, no names left unnamed of those in the field with whom, on both empirical and theoretical grounds, they strenuously disagree. It is an engaging book that needed to be and is up close and personal. In so doing, they have produced what may be the most comprehensive critique and rebuttal to date of the omnipresent media-violence and aggression argument."
—JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY
Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology provides a multimethod critique of the media violence/social aggression myth. It provides policy makers and students with information to understand why the violence/media aggression hypothesis does not explain or predict how most people react to what they see and hear in the media. Authors Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen take the reader through a history of media effects research, pointing out where that research has made claims that go beyond empirical evidence.
This is an ideal text for graduate courses such as Mass Communication Theory, Media and Society, Media Effects, and Research Methods in Media in the departments of communication, media studies, journalism, sociology, cultural studies, and political science. It is also vital reading for scholars, researcher, and policy makers interested in media effects.
Results 1-3 of 44
... Paik and Comstock ( 1994 ) the high end at r = .31 ( see also Bushman & Anderson , 2001 ) . So let us follow Cantor ( 2000 ) and take the middle value of.20 . Using the traditional explanation of correlation , the value means that 4 ...
First , they believe critics atomize the body of work in this area , which means critics nitpick individual studies , which have flaws that are easy to exploit . Huesmann and Malamuth suggest that the body of work should not be picked ...
As a means to an end , children and concerns about their welfare provide legitimizing means to bring about a goal that , if stated boldly and forthrightly , might be seen for what it is , an attempt to manipulate , censor , and control ...
What people are saying - Write a review
Setting the Stage 1
The Epistemology of Media Effects
10 other sections not shown