Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology
SAGE Publications, 2008 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 268 pages
"Media Violence and Aggression is a thoughtful and sophisticated work that dismantles the core assumptions of the media violence hypothesis piece by piece...This book makes several core contributions to the discussion on media violence effects above those seen in other critical works."
—Christopher J. Ferguson, PsycCRITIQUES
The authors of Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology, Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen, are determined to leave no stone unturned, no perspectives unexplored, no names left unnamed of those in the field with whom, on both empirical and theoretical grounds, they strenuously disagree. It is an engaging book that needed to be and is up close and personal. In so doing, they have produced what may be the most comprehensive critique and rebuttal to date of the omnipresent media-violence and aggression argument."
—JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY
Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology provides a multimethod critique of the media violence/social aggression myth. It provides policy makers and students with information to understand why the violence/media aggression hypothesis does not explain or predict how most people react to what they see and hear in the media. Authors Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen take the reader through a history of media effects research, pointing out where that research has made claims that go beyond empirical evidence.
This is an ideal text for graduate courses such as Mass Communication Theory, Media and Society, Media Effects, and Research Methods in Media in the departments of communication, media studies, journalism, sociology, cultural studies, and political science. It is also vital reading for scholars, researcher, and policy makers interested in media effects.
Results 1-3 of 97
It becomes some form of uses and gratifications or — weaker still — active audience and activated text argument . ... When one does argue for multilayered meaning making — as Luhmann ( 1990 , 1995 ) argues we must — that moves meaning ...
That's what has been called the “ convergence argument , ” something we will study in greater detail in this chapter . Second , Huesmann and Malamuth ( 1986 , p . 2 ) argue that critics of causation inappropriately disregard laboratory ...
PM : You seem to be arguing that aggression in society is not the problem causationists make it out to be . ... Now we can argue whether arrests equate to incidents , but even if the number of crime events was 10 times greater than the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
Setting the Stage 1
The Epistemology of Media Effects
10 other sections not shown