Page images
PDF
EPUB

ilure.

-light the
whom he
tions, he

ed him in
Dermission
royed his
o launch

t in store
low the

the loss

by the

icted in iumphs wolved

e, both

proved

пешу,

im in

road

OWD

tion,

con

him

the

hey

of a

ese,

,in

nts

1st

де

e

e

3

Job represents the Redeemer Whom he foretold. Job sinned in his words, what else does he do, but confess Book that God, Who pledged Himself for him, had been the loser.

mere

antur

2. But since the ancient fathers, like fruitful trees, are not merely beauteous in appearance, but also profitable through their fertility, their life must be so considered by us, that when we admire the freshness of their history, we may learn also how fruitful they are in allegory, in order that, since the smell of their leaves is pleasant, we may learn also how sweet is the taste of their fruits. For no one ever possessed the grace of heavenly adoption but he who has received it through the knowledge of the Only-begotten. It is right then that He should shine forth in their life and words, Who so enlightens them that they may be able to shine. For when the light of a candle is kindled in the dark, the candle, which causes other objects to be seen, is first seen itself. And so, if we are truly endeavouring to behold the objects which are enlightened, it is necessary for us to open the eyes of our mind to that Lightening which gives them light. But it is this which shines forth in these very discourses of blessed Job, when the shades of allegory too have been driven away, as though the gloom of midnight had been dispelled, a bright light as it were flaming across them. As when it is said, I know that my Redeemer liveth, Job 19, Paul had doubtless 25. and in my flesh I shall see God. discovered this light in the night of history, when he said, All were baptized in Moses in the cloud and in the sea, and 1 Cor. all ate the same spiritual meat, and all drank the same spiritual drink. But they drank of the spiritual Rock that followed them, but the Rock was Christ. If then the Rock represented the Redeemer, why should not blessed Job suggest the type of Him, since he signified in his suffering Him Whom he spake of in his voice? And hence he is not improperly called Job, that is to say, "grieving," because he sets forth in his own person the image of Him, of Whom it is announced long before by Isaiah, that He Himself bore Is. 53, 4. our griefs. It should be further known, that our Redeemer has represented Himself as one Person with Holy Church, whom He has assumed to Himself. For it is said of Him, Eph. 4, Which is the Head, even Christ. And again it is written of 15. His Church; And the body of Christ, which is the Church. 24.

Col. 1,

10, 2-4.

XXIII.

1.

4 Job's wife typifies the carnal; his friends, heretics.

JOB 32, Blessed Job therefore, who was more truly a type of Christ, since he prophesied of His passion, not by words only, but also by his sufferings, when he dwells on setting forth the Redeemer in his words and deeds, is sometimes suddenly turning to signify His body; in order that, as we believe Christ and His Church to be one Person, we may behold this signified also by the actions of a single man.

3.4.

3. But what else is signified by his wife, who provokes him to words of blasphemy, but the depravity of carnal men? For placed, with yet unreformed manners, within the pale of the Holy Church, they press harder on those of faithful lives, the nearer they are to them; because when they cannot as being faithful be avoided by the faithful, they are endured as a greater evil, the more inward it is. But his friends, who while pretending to advise, inveigh against him, represent to us heretics, who under the pretence of advising, carry on the business of leading astray. And thus while speaking to Job on behalf of the Lord, they hear His reproof; because all heretics in truth while endeavouring to maintain God's cause, do in fact offend Him. Whence also it is properly Job 13, said to them by the same holy man, I desire to reason with God, first shewing that ye are forgers of lies, and followers of corrupt doctrines. It is plain then that they typify heretics, since the holy man accuses them of being devoted to the profession of false doctrines. And since Job is by interpretation grieving, (for by his grief is set forth either the passion of the Mediator, or the travails of Holy Church, which is harassed by the manifold labours of this present life,) so do his friends also by the very word which is used for their names set forth the nature of their conduct. For Eliphaz signifies in Latin "contempt of God;" and what else is the conduct of heretics than a proud contempt of God by the false notions they entertain of Him? Bildad is interpreted "oldness alone." And well are all heretics termed oldness alone, in the. things they speak of God, since they are anxious to appear preachers, not with any honest intention, but with an earnest desire after worldly honour. For they are urged to speak not by the zeal of the new man, but by the evil principles of their old life. Sophar too is called in Latin 'dissipation of the prospect,' or a 'dissipating of

[ocr errors][merged small]

e of Christ,

s only, but

forth the = suddenly ve believe

y

behold

provokes al men? pale of faithful

cannot

ndured

riends, resent

ry on

aking

cause

God's

erly

with

ers

ily

Fed

by

er

Their names explained. Eliu type of the arrogant. 5

XXIII.

the prospect.' For the minds of the faithful raise them- Book selves to the contemplation of things above: but when the words of the heretics endeavour to draw them aside from the right objects of contemplation, they do their best to dissipate the prospect. In the three names then of Job's friends, there are set forth three cases of the ruin of heretics. For did they not despise God, they would never entertain false notions respecting Him; and did they not contract oldness, they would not err in their estimate of the new life; and unless they marred the contemplation of the good, the divine judgments would not have reproved them with so strict a scrutiny, for the faults which they committed in their words. By despising God then, they keep themselves in their oldness: but by remaining in their oldness, they obstruct the view of them that are right by their crooked discoursing.

For when sensaid to be bad,

2.

4. After these also, Eliu, a younger person, is joined to them
in their reproaches of blessed Job. In his person is repre-
sented a class of teachers, who are faithful, but yet arrogant.
Nor do we easily understand his words, unless we consider
them by the help of the subsequent reproof of the Lord.
Who is he that involves sentences in unskilful words? for Job 38,
when He uses the word 'sentences,' but does not imme-
diately subjoin of what nature they are, He intends the word
without doubt to be understood favourably.
tences' are spoken of, unless they are
they cannot be understood in a bad sense. For we always
take the word in a good sense, if no unfavourable addition is
made; as it is written, A slothful man seems wiser in his own Prov.
26, 16.
opinion than seven men uttering sentences. But by its
being said that his sentences are involved in unskilful
language, it is plainly shewn that they were uttered by him
with the folly of pride. For it is a great unskilfulness in
him, to be unable to express himself with humility in what
he says, and to blend with sentiments of truth the words of
pride.

5. For the nature of every thing that is said can be dis-
tinguished by four different qualities. If, for instance,
either bad things are said badly, good things well, bad things
well, or good things badly. A bad thing is badly said, when
wrong advice is given; as it is written, Curse God, and die. Job 2,9.

1.

Matt. 3,

2.

26.

6 What is spoken, and how. The three friends reconciled.

JOB 32, A good thing is well said, when right matters are rightly preached; as John says, Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. A bad thing is well spoken, when a fault is adduced by the speaker, simply to be reproved; as Paul Rom. 1, says, The women changed their natural use into that which is against nature. In which place he subjoined too the execrable doings of men. But he related these unseemly things in a seemly way, that by telling of things unbecoming, he might recal many to the practice of what is becoming. But a good thing is ill spoken, when what is proper is brought forward with an improper object; as the Pharisees are reported to have said to the blind man who had received his sight, Be thou His disciple; for they said this for the express purpose of reproaching him, not as John11, wishing what they said; or as Caiaphas says, It is expedient that one man should die for the people, that the whole nation perish not. It was a good thing which he said, but not with good view; for while he longed for His cruel death, he prophesied the grace of redemption. And in like manner Eliu also is reproved for saying right things in a wrong way: because in the very truths which he utters he is puffed up with arrogance. And he represents thereby the character of the arrogant, because through a sense of what is right he rises up into words of pride.

John 9,

28.

50.

6. But what is meant by the Divine Voice directing that the three friends should be reconciled by seven sacrifices, while it leaves Eliu only beneath the reproof of a single sentence; except it be that heretics, when bedewed with the superabundance of Divine grace, sometimes return to the unity of Holy Church? This is excellently set forth by the very reconciliation of the friends, for whom nevertheless blessed Job is directed to pray. Because in truth the sacrifices of heretics cannot be acceptable to God, unless they be offered for them by the hands of the Church Catholic, that they may gain a healing remedy by her merits, whom they used to smite, by attacking her with the shafts of their reproaches. And thence is it that seven sacrifices are said to have been offered for them, because whilst they receive on confession the Spirit of sevenfold grace, they are atoned for, as it were, by seven oblations. Wherefore in the

e

reconciled.

are rightly of hearen

a fault is ; as Paul hat which

[blocks in formation]

what is en what

as the

in who

ey said

not as

dient

whole

1, but

th, he

nner

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Meaning of their sacrifices. Eliu reproved.

1.

Rev. 1,

Apocalypse of John, the whole Church is represented by the Book
sevenfold number of the Churches: and hence is it that XXIII.
Solomon speaks thus of Wisdom, Wisdom hath builded her 11.
house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars. The heretics Prov. 9,
then on their reconciliation express, by the very number of
the sacrifices, their own former character, since it is only by
their returning that they are united to the perfection of
sevenfold grace.
But they are properly represented as
having offered for themselves bulls and rams. For in a bull
is designated the neck of pride, in a ram the leading of the
flocks that follow. What then is the offering of bulls and
rams on their behalf, but the destruction of their proud
leadership, that they may think humbly of themselves, and
not seduce any longer the hearts of the innocent to follow
them? For they had started aside with swelling neck from
the general body of the Church, and were drawing after
them the weakminded, as flocks following their guidance.
Let them come then to blessed Job, that is, let them return
to the Church, and offer bulls and rams to be slaughtered for
a sevenfold sacrifice, who in order to be united to the
Church Catholic, by the coming in of a spirit of humility,
have to put an end to whatever swelling thoughts they
before used to entertain from their haughty leadership.

7. But Eliu (by whom are designated those lovers of
vain-glory who, living within the pale of the Church, scorn
to state in a humble way the sound views which they hold)
is not directed to be reconciled by sacrifice. For those who
are proud, and yet faithful, because they are already within
the pale, cannot be brought back by seven sacrifices. Yet
the divine wisdom reproves these people in the person of
Eliu, and blames in them not their sentences of truth, but
their temper and language of pride. But what is the mean-
ing of the reproof, except that the chiding of the divine
severity chastens them with scourges as placed within the
Church, or by a righteous judgment leaves them to them-
selves? For such as these preach the truth within the
Church, but, in the judgment of God, deserve to hear an
unfavourable sentence, because by the sound truths which
they state, which are not their own, they seek not the glory
of their author, but their own credit. We must therefore

« PreviousContinue »