The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive ScienceNick Chater, Mike Oaksford The rational analysis method, first proposed by John R. Anderson, has been enormously influential in helping us understand high-level cognitive processes. The Probabilistic Mind is a follow-up to the influential and highly cited 'Rational Models of Cognition' (OUP, 1998). It brings together developments in understanding how, and how far, high-level cognitive processes can be understood in rational terms, and particularly using probabilistic Bayesian methods. It synthesizes and evaluates the progress in the past decade, taking into account developments in Bayesian statistics, statistical analysis of the cognitive 'environment' and a variety of theoretical and experimental lines of research. The scope of the book is broad, covering important recent work in reasoning, decision making, categorization, and memory. Including chapters from many of the leading figures in this field, The Probabilistic Mind will be valuable for psychologists and philosophers interested in cognition. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 42
Page 11
... framework has proved to be a remarkably pro- ductive framework in which to analyze human motor control . As a final example , consider probabilistic approaches to language processing ( see Jurafsky , 2003 ; Chater & Manning , 2006 , for ...
... framework has proved to be a remarkably pro- ductive framework in which to analyze human motor control . As a final example , consider probabilistic approaches to language processing ( see Jurafsky , 2003 ; Chater & Manning , 2006 , for ...
Page 13
... framework into which a diverse range of traditionally separate issues can be analyzed . Hence , divisions between topics are typically less sharp than in many traditional psychological frameworks . Thus , for example , learning ...
... framework into which a diverse range of traditionally separate issues can be analyzed . Hence , divisions between topics are typically less sharp than in many traditional psychological frameworks . Thus , for example , learning ...
Page 487
... framework in order to use that framework to describe what people are actually computing . Generally this involves first choosing a modeling framework ( normally Bayesian analysis ) and then representing people's task assump- tions ...
... framework in order to use that framework to describe what people are actually computing . Generally this involves first choosing a modeling framework ( normally Bayesian analysis ) and then representing people's task assump- tions ...
Contents
prospects for a Bayesian cognitive science | 3 |
A primer on probabilistic inference | 33 |
Rational analyses instrumentalism and implementations | 59 |
Copyright | |
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Nick Chater,Mike Oaksford Limited preview - 2008 |
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Nick Chater,Mike Oaksford No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
algorithm alternative analysis approach approximate argument associated assumed assumption attribute Bayesian behavior beliefs Cambridge causal cause Chater choice cluster cognitive complexity computational concept conditional consider correlation decision depends described developed distribution effect environment estimate et al evidence example expected experience experimental explain framing function given heuristic human hypothesis important individual inference involved Journal judgment language learning logic mean memory methods natural normative Oaksford objects observed optimal options outcomes parameters participants particular performance possible posterior predictions present Press principle prior probabilistic probability problem produce prospect Psychological question rational rational analysis reasoning reference relation relative represent representation require response Review rule sample Science selection semantic shows similar simple statistical structure subjective suggest task theory tion trials University utility variables weight