The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive ScienceNick Chater, Mike Oaksford The rational analysis method, first proposed by John R. Anderson, has been enormously influential in helping us understand high-level cognitive processes. The Probabilistic Mind is a follow-up to the influential and highly cited 'Rational Models of Cognition' (OUP, 1998). It brings together developments in understanding how, and how far, high-level cognitive processes can be understood in rational terms, and particularly using probabilistic Bayesian methods. It synthesizes and evaluates the progress in the past decade, taking into account developments in Bayesian statistics, statistical analysis of the cognitive 'environment' and a variety of theoretical and experimental lines of research. The scope of the book is broad, covering important recent work in reasoning, decision making, categorization, and memory. Including chapters from many of the leading figures in this field, The Probabilistic Mind will be valuable for psychologists and philosophers interested in cognition. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 50
Page 278
... developed , which address the process by which preferential choice is issued ( Steward , this volume ; Roe et al . , 2001 ; Usher & Mclelland , 2004 ) . It is the synthesis of these two lines of work that defines the new field of ...
... developed , which address the process by which preferential choice is issued ( Steward , this volume ; Roe et al . , 2001 ; Usher & Mclelland , 2004 ) . It is the synthesis of these two lines of work that defines the new field of ...
Page 455
... developed a theory ( power PC theory ) , which formalizes how we can infer unobservable causal powers from ... developed as psychological theories , causal Bayes net the- ory was originally developed by philosophers , computer scientists ...
... developed a theory ( power PC theory ) , which formalizes how we can infer unobservable causal powers from ... developed as psychological theories , causal Bayes net the- ory was originally developed by philosophers , computer scientists ...
Page 458
... developed and will therefore compete . How can competing rational models be tested ? We will discuss some general principles : ( 1 ) The more psychological evidence we consider , the higher the likelihood that we will be able to ...
... developed and will therefore compete . How can competing rational models be tested ? We will discuss some general principles : ( 1 ) The more psychological evidence we consider , the higher the likelihood that we will be able to ...
Contents
prospects for a Bayesian cognitive science | 3 |
A primer on probabilistic inference | 33 |
Rational analyses instrumentalism and implementations | 59 |
Copyright | |
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Nick Chater,Mike Oaksford Limited preview - 2008 |
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Nick Chater,Mike Oaksford No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
algorithm alternative analysis approach approximate argument associated assumed assumption attribute Bayesian behavior beliefs Cambridge causal cause Chater choice cluster cognitive complexity computational concept conditional consider correlation decision depends described developed distribution effect environment estimate et al evidence example expected experience experimental explain framing function given heuristic human hypothesis important individual inference involved Journal judgment language learning logic mean memory methods natural normative Oaksford objects observed optimal options outcomes parameters participants particular performance possible posterior predictions present Press principle prior probabilistic probability problem produce prospect Psychological question rational rational analysis reasoning reference relation relative represent representation require response Review rule sample Science selection semantic shows similar simple statistical structure subjective suggest task theory tion trials University utility variables weight